52.8 F
Islamabad
Friday, November 22, 2024

Sedition Law Is An Unconstitutional Law, Colonial Heritage Abolished, Rules Lahore High Court

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has made a significant ruling on the country’s sedition law, Section 124 of the Pakistan Penal Code. In its decision, the court has declared Section 124 to be unconstitutional, citing its violation of Article 19 of the Pakistani constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech for all citizens.

The decision was the result of a legal challenge brought by journalist and lawyer Abuzar Salman Niazi, who was asked to take up the case by slain journalist Arshad Sharif. Niazi argued that the sedition law, which was originally passed by the British Raj in the aftermath of the 1857 Independence movement, was no longer relevant in modern-day Pakistan and that it posed a threat to the country’s democracy and freedom of expression.

The history of the sedition law in India and Pakistan can be traced back to the 19th century, when it was first drafted by British historian-politician Thomas Macaulay in 1837. However, it was not included in the Indian Penal Code when it was enacted in 1860. It was later inserted in the code in 1870 through the Penal Code (Amendment) Act of that year by James Stephen, a British colonial administrator.

The sedition law was introduced at a time when the colonial masters felt the need to perpetuate their imperial rule and suppress any dissenting voices that could potentially challenge their authority. The law was used extensively to silence political opposition and suppress freedom of expression throughout the colonial era, and continued to be used after India gained independence in 1947.

The ruling is likely to be seen as a major victory for free speech advocates in Pakistan, who have long criticized the sedition law as an outdated and oppressive measure that has been used to silence dissenting voices. The decision also underscores the importance of an independent judiciary in upholding the rule of law and protecting the rights of citizens.

However, it remains to be seen how the government and other stakeholders will respond to the ruling. Some may argue that the sedition law is necessary to maintain national security and prevent the spread of extremist ideas, while others may call for a more comprehensive overhaul of Pakistan’s legal system to better protect individual rights and freedoms.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles